ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 9161
01/06/10 03:54 PM
Posts: 857
01/06/10 04:14 PM
Posts: 567
01/06/10 04:16 PM
Posts: 682
01/06/10 04:28 PM
Dawson: one great season and in Wrigley Field at that does not equal the Hall Of Fame.
But an On base percentage of .323? Well nuff said about that.
I am old school Batting Average matters
Fred McGriff's stats dwarf Dawsons in every category except Stolen Bases
Jeter's OPS are better than Dawson's and he is a shortstop.
Posts: 302
01/06/10 05:05 PM
Posts: 359
01/06/10 05:19 PM
Posts: 601
01/06/10 05:44 PM
Dawson dealt with severe knee pains from the very start of his career, and the way he went on about it you'd think that overcoming injuries and pain was somehow a major factor in his vote. Where he came up with that I have no idea
01/06/10 05:45 PM
Posts: 471
01/06/10 06:03 PM
boba44 wrote: I've seen Hall of Famers, and Mr. Dawson, you're no Hall of Famer. Roberto Alomar,s exclusion is a joke.
Posts: 232
01/06/10 06:27 PM
Posts: 184
01/06/10 06:46 PM
01/06/10 06:56 PM
jakobscalpel wrote: If you ever played the old Nintendo 8bit RBI Baseball game you know that Andre deserved to get in....easily.
Posts: 7
01/06/10 07:45 PM
Posts: 1834
01/06/10 07:47 PM
01/06/10 11:17 PM
Craig Bueno wrote: Whatever writer voted for David Segui should be stripped of their vote.
Posts: 128
01/06/10 11:38 PM
sposfan1 wrote: So explain how he ends up with 31 LESS votes!?!?
01/06/10 11:52 PM
01/07/10 12:02 AM
rjb182 wrote: As I commented down in the Talking Baseball section, I'm okay with the results in general. If Rice and Perez didn't bring down the Hall standards, neither will Dawson, and I hope Blyleven makes it next year. But I'm flummoxed by a system that results in Dawson getting in instead of a clearly superior player (Alomar-- actually, two superior players counting Larkin) merely because he had a few years to build up votes while Robby was still on the first ballot...
01/07/10 09:14 AM
Posts: 63
01/07/10 01:11 PM
Share This